In the olden days, if one country thought another country was weak, they would invade (and possibly genocide). (Inspired by Lebensraum.) This created incentive for countries to maintain some sort of a reasonably functioning, economically productive state. (Unlike the collapse of the western Roman empire.)
Nowadays, if a country can field a nuclear arsenal, they can retaliate against invasion with such devastating force that no one will dare invade. Therefore, there is no longer as much incentive to maintain a reasonably functioning state.
Is this logic true? Are nuclear weapons unique and unprecedented in the history of military warfare in their ability to provide immunity from invasion?
Maintaining a nuclear arsenal does require a reasonably functioning state.
If a state is functioning poorly, even without invasion it may fall to internal forces of regime change, so the incentive to maintain a reasonably functioning state still exists even in a nuclear armed power. (E.g., regime change in Soviet Union.) Civil war could have external countries supporting the rebels. Is an external country supporting and winning a rebellion functionally equivalent to invasion? One could imagine the installed puppet government committing acts like genocide to benefit that external country that supported the rebellion.
If a nuclear armed government is facing internal rebellion supported by an external country, will they use their nuclear weapons against the external country? Should they?
Is the incentive to maintain a reasonably functioning state even good? One could imagine a state using its nuclear umbrella to allow its citizenry to live peaceful and happy, albeit technologically backward and less economically productive, lives. In contrast, in the past, a "reasonably functioning state" probably meant exactly one thing, "able to field an army", which is not necessarily good for the country or for human civilization as a whole.
Military alliances between nuclear and non-nuclear armed powers also cause weird effects. The non-nuclear ally must accede to the desires of the nuclear ally or risk being expelled from the alliance. Meanwhile, the non-nuclear ally gains the immunity from invasion accorded to nuclear armed powers.
No comments :
Post a Comment